🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on NZ local authorities will be cut by more than half, following a controversial legislative amendment that required local governments to put the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include multiple councillors based on demographic data, were established in 2001 to provide Māori electors the choice to elect a guaranteed Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Initially, local governments could only create a Māori ward by initially putting it to a community referendum in their region. Communities often spent years generating community backing and pushing their local governments to establish Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government allowed municipal authorities to establish a Māori ward without initially mandating them to put it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the current administration reversed the change, saying local residents ought to determine whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The new legislation mandated local authorities that had established a ward under Labour’s rules to conduct binding referendums concurrently with the municipal polls, which concluded on October 11. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the public vote, 17 decided to retain their wards, and 25 to abolish theirs – showing numerous areas against guaranteed Māori representation.

The results provided “a vital step in restoring community self-determination.”

Critics however have condemned the government’s law change as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the coalition government has ushered in extensive reversals to measures designed to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has stated it aims to end “race-based” approaches, and asserts it is committed to improving outcomes for Māori and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – six of the seven cities mandated to hold referendums backed Māori wards, while rural regions leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent municipal polls recorded the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with less than a third of citizens casting a vote, leading to calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Councils are able to establish other types of wards – such as countryside seats – without initially mandating a community ballot. The disparate requirements placed on Indigenous representation indicated the government was targeting Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark concerned the 17 areas that voted to keep their wards.