🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters praising your insights on growing your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to explore collaborations?

If not, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of women participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment recently after viral posts indicated that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to include what they termed "bro-coded" language - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system prioritizes male users who use online business jargon.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which posts appear to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" influence how content perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your posts appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her reach decline significantly.

The Method

• First, she changed her gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with comparable "agentic" language

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my content were more personal - brief and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after seven days, stating "Each day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some participants experienced favorable results. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" described a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in informal experiments where the same content by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."